| 1 |
Dnia 2014-07-21, o godz. 22:21:42 |
| 2 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> napisał(a): |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 23:15:41 +0200 |
| 5 |
> Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 23:06:07 +0200 |
| 7 |
> > Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
> > > Maybe this could be solved by having two kinds of revisions: |
| 9 |
> > > - One would rebuild all as usually (for example, -r1...) |
| 10 |
> > > - The other one would only regenerate VDB and wouldn't change the |
| 11 |
> > > installed files (for example, -r1.1) |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Or the package manager looks at changed in *DEPEND between the repo |
| 14 |
> > and vdb and resolves those. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> ...assuming that the ebuild hasn't been removed, and that it can be |
| 17 |
> associated correctly when overlays are involved, and that the change |
| 18 |
> wasn't a change where a saved pkg_prerm uses the old dependency, not |
| 19 |
> the new one, or all the other ways this breaks. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
You forgot about slot operators. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
The funny thing is, almost none of the Gentoo developers even know that |
| 24 |
slot operators disable dynamic dependencies completely in portage. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Best regards, |
| 28 |
Michał Górny |
Archives