| 1 |
On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 10:53:37PM -0400, Ionen Wolkens wrote: |
| 2 |
> Guess there's a lot of other options that could be considered as well. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> --- files |
| 5 |
> >>> text |
| 6 |
> * current, it wasn't aligned now that I look at it again |
| 7 |
> (relying only on color to convey type feels clearly wrong to me) |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> --- files |
| 10 |
> >>>> text |
| 11 |
> [QA] new based on current PR |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> >>> text |
| 14 |
> [QA] aligned 1 character further, maybe skipping changing >>> is fine? |
| 15 |
> (then again that it's further is what threw me off at first) |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> >>> text |
| 18 |
> QA* similar to before, but aligned using only 3 chars |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> >>> text |
| 21 |
> [Q] kinda more obscure but it can work |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Guess should also add these: |
| 25 |
>>> text |
| 26 |
Q* Notice: |
| 27 |
E* Some error happened |
| 28 |
(closest to before by making use of the former leading space, thus |
| 29 |
no alignment changes) |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
>>> text |
| 32 |
QA Notice: |
| 33 |
EE Some error happened |
| 34 |
(at least clearer than Q* Notice, but unsure about no separator.. guess |
| 35 |
it could work?) |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
> >>>> text |
| 38 |
> QA* probably closest to how it was before alignment-wise, but meh at 4 > |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> >>> message |
| 41 |
> QA> not convinced about this one, but throwing it here anyway |
| 42 |
> (other characters could be considered as well) |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
> Maybe a poll of some kind may help, personally undecided on what I |
| 45 |
> like better beside agreeing that a change is needed. |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
-- |
| 49 |
ionen |
Archives