Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Joseph Hardin <jhlazer@×××××××.net>
To: Nicholas Wourms <dragon@g.o>
Cc: Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o>, Taylor Christopher P <ct@××××××××××.edu>, Pieter Van den Abeele <pvdabeel@g.o>, gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Ported to OS X
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 05:24:29
Message-Id: 1BE67C40-962A-11D7-B88A-000A95686F0A@charter.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Ported to OS X by Nicholas Wourms
1 I have a Powerbook G4 Ti(1ghz) that i'd be willing to help test stuff
2 with.
3 Joe
4
5 On Tuesday, Jun 3, 2003, at 17:12 America/Denver, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
6
7 > Daniel Robbins wrote:
8 >> On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 05:42:34PM -0400, Taylor Christopher P wrote:
9 >>> when you say "open bug" whatcha mean? oh, and i need people to help
10 >>> me
11 >>> figure out somethings with the source... i remember vlad from my
12 >>> early
13 >>> gentoo-ppc days. i'll need to email them both...
14 >>>
15 >>> thanks!
16 >> Probably best if I get Portage working initially under OS X. I've
17 >> started
18 >> the port today and I'm not expecting that much difficulty -- should
19 >> have it
20 >> mostly done some time today. We can officially support OS X and make
21 >> this
22 >> into an official Gentoo project hosted on www.gentoo.org. :)
23 >> Best Regards,
24 >
25 > I've have a MacOS X machine as well, so I'd be willing to help test
26 > and perhaps contribute (as time allows)... IIRC, SpanKY has an OS X
27 > machine as well, so I'd say we are pretty much covered in the OS X
28 > department :-D.
29 >
30 > One thing to note, libtool support on OS X sucks bug time, especially
31 > with libtool-1.4. We should give some thought to integrating a
32 > libtool 1.5 ebuild now that it is released and stable.
33 >
34 > Cheers,
35 > Nicholas
36 >
37 >
38 > --
39 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
40 >
41
42
43 --
44 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Ported to OS X Sascha Schwabbauer <cybersystem@g.o>