Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>
To: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@g.o>
Cc: gentoo development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>, Gentoo hppa AT <hppa@g.o>, Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] profiles/profiles.desc: move hppa profiles stable->exp
Date: Sun, 06 May 2018 17:40:26
Message-Id: CAEdQ38G-qbVgfL-aiFkJAk1O0O_d0yhcyua4vA5LCajhAD-+pA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] profiles/profiles.desc: move hppa profiles stable->exp by Sergei Trofimovich
1 On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 2:20 AM, Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@g.o> wrote:
2 > To release the burden on maintainers having to keep outdated
3 > latest stable versions of packages do not block them on hppa
4 > stabilization.
5 >
6 > hppa@ will still attempt to keep stable keywords for base packages.
7 >
8 > CC: hppa@g.o
9 > CC: jer@g.o
10 > CC: mattst88@g.o
11 > Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/629554
12 > Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@g.o>
13 > ---
14 > profiles/profiles.desc | 6 +++---
15 > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
16 >
17 > diff --git a/profiles/profiles.desc b/profiles/profiles.desc
18 > index 7d4b5781c88..5c5d06c7d96 100644
19 > --- a/profiles/profiles.desc
20 > +++ b/profiles/profiles.desc
21 > @@ -108,9 +108,9 @@ arm64 default/linux/arm64/17.0/systemd dev
22 >
23 > # HPPA Profiles
24 > # @MAINTAINER: hppa@g.o
25 > -hppa default/linux/hppa/13.0 stable
26 > -hppa default/linux/hppa/13.0/desktop dev
27 > -hppa default/linux/hppa/13.0/developer dev
28 > +hppa default/linux/hppa/13.0 exp
29 > +hppa default/linux/hppa/13.0/desktop exp
30 > +hppa default/linux/hppa/13.0/developer exp
31 > hppa default/linux/hppa/17.0 exp
32 > hppa default/linux/hppa/17.0/desktop exp
33 > hppa default/linux/hppa/17.0/developer exp
34 > --
35 > 2.17.0
36 >
37
38 Acked-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>
39
40 For those not in #gentoo-hppa, I attempted to start a conversation
41 with Jeroen about moving hppa to fully ~arch last week. Rolf (who has
42 been stabilizing packages on hppa and sparc) said he was against it,
43 but Jeroen never replied.

Replies