Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Sheng Yu <syu.os@××××××××××.com> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o, "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/3] glep-0074: clarifications about size and checksum fields | ||
| Date: | Sat, 24 Sep 2022 07:34:22 | ||
| Message-Id: | u35ch445r@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/3] glep-0074: clarifications about size and checksum fields by Sheng Yu |
||
| 1 | >>>>> On Fri, 23 Sep 2022, Sheng Yu wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > The hash does not need to be lowercase. It can be a quick fix in |
| 4 | > portage to accept any case. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | That would break backwards compatibility. Also, having a uniquely |
| 7 | defined format helps when comparing hashes with the output of tools like |
| 8 | b2sum or sha512sum. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Ulrich |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |