Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy on RESTRICT=[no]mirror and use of mirror://foo/
Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 21:16:10
Message-Id: 20050505222006.736bf1c7@snowdrop
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Policy on RESTRICT=[no]mirror and use of mirror://foo/ by "Robin H. Johnson"
1 On Thu, 5 May 2005 14:04:20 -0700 "Robin H. Johnson"
2 <robbat2@g.o> wrote:
3 | I've tried to dig through our policy documents, to find the policy
4 | regarding RESTRICT=mirror/fetch. I don't find anything in the htdocs
5 | tree from CVS, beyond a few brief mentions in the handbook.
6
7 Some of it's in the "not policy" documents:
8
9 http://www.firedrop.org.uk/devmanual/general-concepts/mirrors/
10
11 Contributions welcomed if someone knows exactly what the rules are :)
12
13 | RESTRICT=[no]mirror
14 | -------------------
15 | - Files too large for the mirrors? (What is the size limit?)
16 | - License issues?
17 | - anything else?
18
19 AFAIK it's now just licence issues.
20
21 | Unless there is something I've missed, why do we have ebuilds with
22 | RESTRICT=nomirror, having a GPL-2 license, and distributed via
23 | sourceforge? Wouldn't RESTRICT=primaryuri be much better? Most fetches
24 | would go to SF first, and we'd still have a copy available on our
25 | mirrors.
26
27 Now that primaryuri exists, yes. That's a fairly recent feature,
28 however.
29
30 --
31 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
32 Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
33 Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm