1 |
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:32:31 +0200 |
2 |
Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On 21/03/13 12:29, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
5 |
> > These packages have inotify as local USE flag: |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > app-editors/emacs-vcs |
8 |
> > app-misc/recoll |
9 |
> > app-misc/strigi |
10 |
> > dev-libs/ecore |
11 |
> > dev-vcs/git-annex |
12 |
> > media-sound/mpd |
13 |
> > net-im/ekg2 |
14 |
> > net-misc/mediatomb |
15 |
> > sys-fs/aufs2 |
16 |
> > sys-fs/aufs3 |
17 |
> > sys-process/cronie |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > Should we make it a global flag? What description is better: |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > inotify - Enable inotify filesystem monitoring support |
22 |
> > inotify - Enable inotify file change notification support |
23 |
> |
24 |
> +1, ... |
25 |
> |
26 |
> ... despite that most of these shouldn't even have a USE flag for |
27 |
> inotify, instead it should always be enabled with 'kernel_linux' and let |
28 |
> the application itself do a runtime check if inotify is available or not |
29 |
> since these have no external dependencies (other than virtual/os-headers) |
30 |
> not everything should be put behind USE flag :-/ |
31 |
|
32 |
net-im/ekg2 fixed. But you should seriously consider opening a bug, at |
33 |
least a common one CC-ing all the remaining maintainers. |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
Best regards, |
38 |
Michał Górny |