1 |
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:06:46 +0100 |
2 |
Christian Faulhammer <opfer@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > One thing that would need to be decided: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > LICENSE="GPL-2" |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > Would that require an = prefix? To simplify things, we could say |
8 |
> > that *only* the postfix [] form counts for licenses... |
9 |
> |
10 |
> To have backwards compatability...yes. |
11 |
|
12 |
Backwards compatibility isn't necessary over an EAPI bump. The question |
13 |
is whether it's sufficiently useful that having inconsistent parsing |
14 |
rules for dep specs and license specs is acceptable. |
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
Ciaran McCreesh |