Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Tom Wesley <tom@×××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for August 7
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:46:27
Message-Id: 20080804014620.0ae66f5b@tlaloc.tomaw.net
In Reply to: RE: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for August 7 by Chrissy Fullam
1 Hi,
2
3 For clarity, I am tomaw, a member of freenode staff. For even more
4 clarity, I am a member of OFTC staff, although that's not relevant to
5 this posting. I have spent many hours discussing this issue with
6 Chrissy and others and feel some points require clarification.
7
8 On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 08:39:41 -0700
9 "Chrissy Fullam" <musikc@g.o> wrote:
10
11 > > Fair enough. Let me wrap up the IRC part.
12 > >
13 > > 1. I'd like to ask Council to discuss possible reactions to our
14 > > developer being banned from Freenode without providing us with a
15 > > reason. The situation looks like one of Freenode staffers
16 > > overreacted over something Chris said during previous Council
17 > > meeting and banned him to prevent him from attending next meetings
18 > > when he was supposed to provide more information on the CoC topic.
19 > > The ban was removed after an hour,
20 >
21 > The ban was put in place on Sunday; the ban was lifted on Tuesday
22 > evening = way longer than one hour. Chris tried to speak to Freenode
23 > staff on Freenode but was told he was evading the ban and they would
24 > not speak to him there. He had to find out from me what the email
25
26 I have previously indicated on IRC that the omission of the email
27 address to respond to with questions about klines in this kline message
28 was a mistake. He did not have to find out which email address to use
29 from you. I told him myself. I am quite upset that you did not feel it
30 prudent to indicate that we admit this mistake in your email.
31
32 > address was (as it's not documented on Freenode's site) and email
33 > them to ask why he was banned. Christel responded later that day and
34 > simply apologized and removed the ban. Chris again emailed to ask
35 > *why* he was banned but Freenode staff has ignored his second email
36 > requesting information about his own ban.
37
38 I responded personally to this request. I did consider writing
39 another response earlier today asking for more time due to staff
40 availability but decided doing so was overly verbose. If your personal
41 knowledge of the person in question indicates that he prefers more
42 verbose interaction please have him convey this to us and I will be
43 happy to help.
44
45 > To me it looks like they
46 > not only will not tell us, they will not tell the individual who was
47 > actually banned and that is in poor professional taste and only
48 > further serves to drive a wedge between our ability to work with
49 > Freenode.
50
51 freenode can currently only discuss this with the person banned due to
52 legal issues. I am not a lawyer, but I suspect much of what fmccor
53 said to be true.
54
55 > > 2. I want Council to consider moving their meetings somewhere where
56 > > third parties can't control who in Gentoo can attend and who can't.
57 >
58 > This is an interesting idea. Perhaps a good trial for a transition?
59 >
60 > > 3. I want Council to consider creating and using irc.gentoo.org
61 > > alias instead of irc.freenode.net in our docs, news items and so
62 > > on.
63 >
64 > Seems pretty logical so I just want to say that I like this whoever
65 > came up with this. :)
66
67 This seems sensible.
68
69 Thanks,
70
71 --
72 Tom Wesley <tom@×××××.net>

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature