1 |
On 3/6/11 1:22 PM, Christian Ruppert wrote: |
2 |
> We're almost done with the preparation of bugzilla-4.x for bugs.gentoo.org. |
3 |
> So, do we want the new workflow or do we want to keep the old? |
4 |
|
5 |
I like the new workflow more, mostly because of simplicity. This is also |
6 |
closer to what code.google.com uses, and my experience with it was very |
7 |
positive. |
8 |
|
9 |
Before we start arguing for and against various details, let's ask one |
10 |
simple question - are we actually using all those CLOSED and VERIFIED |
11 |
statuses, and what does it change that a bug is REOPENED vs. NEW. |
12 |
|
13 |
Now one of the issues I can indeed understand is the CONFIRMED status |
14 |
vs. UNCONFIRMED. Still, I'm not sure whether we use UNCONFIRMED so much. |
15 |
Anyway, it should be possible to add UNCONFIRMED on top of the new |
16 |
workflow, right? |
17 |
|
18 |
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. |