Archives
Archives
| From: | "Fernando J. Pereda" <ferdy@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: A few questions to our nominees | ||
| Date: | Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:25:11 | ||
| Message-Id: | AF9B2D1F-F39B-42EC-87CF-2F8E8F75D9A8@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: A few questions to our nominees by Luca Barbato |
||
| 1 | On 14 Jun 2008, at 18:23, Luca Barbato wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Fernando J. Pereda wrote: |
| 4 | >>> nope it would resolve as foo_pre1 -> meaningless. |
| 5 | >> So your proposal is unable to handle that case, right? |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > You are forced to put a version, that's all. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Which doesn't always make sense so we are back to 999999999 versions. |
| 10 | I don't consider this an improvement over the current situation. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | - ferdy |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |