Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] introduce Prefix 17.0 profiles.
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:42:23
Message-Id: 197837c5-a1f4-2c2c-5027-a98af1494df2@iee.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] introduce Prefix 17.0 profiles. by kuzetsa
1 On 10/01/18 14:00, kuzetsa wrote:
2 > On 01/09/2018 08:21 AM, Aaron Bauman wrote:
3 >> On January 8, 2018 9:39:47 PM EST, Benda Xu <heroxbd@g.o> wrote:
4 >>> Hi kuzetsa,
5 >>>
6 >>> kuzetsa <kuzetsa@×××××.com> writes:
7 >>>
8 >>>> The term "beyond" feels wrong & confusing.
9 >>>> (Not sure what to replace it with though)
10 >>> How about this?
11 >>>
12 >>> default/linux/amd64/17.0/no-multilib/prefix/kernel-3.2+
13 >>> default/linux/amd64/17.0/no-multilib/prefix/kernel-2.6.32+
14 >>> default/linux/amd64/17.0/no-multilib/prefix/kernel-2.6.16+
15 >>>
16 >>> Yours,
17 >>> Benda
18 >> I like this as it is shorter and makes the version ranges more clear. Lgtm.
19 >>
20 >> -Aaron
21 > Yes. Using a plus looks nicer / cleaner to me too.
22 >
23 Not entirely as a #gentoo-nit-pick .. I'm slightly unclear on the
24 different between 2.6.16+ and 2.6.32+ .. should this potentially be
25 2.16.16-32 perhaps [2.6.16~32 even] or is this more obvious only to me,
26 and more confusing to others....
27
28 MJE

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] introduce Prefix 17.0 profiles. Benda Xu <heroxbd@g.o>