1 |
Mike Myers wrote: |
2 |
> Hello! |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Currently, as you all surely already know, KDE is currently handled with |
5 |
> metapackages or monolithic packages. The metapackages is very |
6 |
> convenient for a more complete install of KDE, and the monolithic |
7 |
> packages are better or a more modular install. However, with the |
8 |
> metapackages, it seems much more difficult than necessary to rebuild the |
9 |
> KDE packages. Like, say I wanted to add a user flag to support |
10 |
> something I just added, like xinerama support. With metapackages the |
11 |
> way they are now, I would have to completely uninstall every single |
12 |
> package and then reemerge the metapackage and it's dependencies. Just |
13 |
> simply reemerging the metapackage doesn't actually recompile anything. |
14 |
> Also, if I wanted to add support for part of KDE, like say, alsa support |
15 |
> for kdemultimedia, I would have to manually unemerge each individual |
16 |
> package related to kdemultimedia and then reemerge the metapackage. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> My question is; Is there any better way to do these kinds of things |
19 |
> yet? If not, are there any plans for making this kind of process any |
20 |
> easier for the users? I really like KDE and I'm sure there are a lot of |
21 |
> other people that do as well. I can understand the reason for going to |
22 |
> metapackages, but it doesn't seem to have been as smooth of a process as |
23 |
> intended. At least not in some aspects. I am not a developer, and I |
24 |
> apologize if this has already been addressed. I haven't seen anything |
25 |
> related to this issue. The KDE howto docs seem to assume the user is |
26 |
> doing an initial install and it doesn't address if part of a metapackage |
27 |
> is to be reinstalled. It also suggests metapackages over monolithic |
28 |
> packages. I'm not really sure of the reason for such a suggestion if |
29 |
> making a change to the USE flags is going to be so difficult. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> Maybe somebody can clear this up for me? Again, I apologize if this has |
32 |
> already been addressed. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> Thanks, |
35 |
> Mike |
36 |
> |
37 |
|
38 |
emerge --deep --newuse --pretend world |
39 |
|
40 |
Regards, |
41 |
Petteri |