1 |
On 19-04-30 19:24:45, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 2019-04-30 at 19:20 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
3 |
> > On 4/30/19 7:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 22:34 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: |
5 |
> > > > In this article on chat services used for OSS: |
6 |
> > > > |
7 |
> > > > https://catfox.life/2019/04/28/keeping-libre-software-accessible-to-all/ |
8 |
> > > > |
9 |
> > > > I was surprised to see a mention of Gentoo as a project that uses "Discord |
10 |
> > > > as an official method of communication". When I searched, I indeed found |
11 |
> > > > https://discordapp.com/invite/gentoo. However, I'd never before heard we |
12 |
> > > > were using Discord (and didn't find any mentions of Discord on the -dev or |
13 |
> > > > -project mailing lists). |
14 |
> > > > |
15 |
> > > > Is this indeed an official venue? It's not listed on |
16 |
> > > > https://gentoo.org/support/ (which does mention IRC). |
17 |
> > > > |
18 |
> > > I've contacted the author and the author refused to change it. |
19 |
> > > The claim is that 'PR team runs it', '8 Gentoo developers have admin |
20 |
> > > rights', 'i.e. it is sanctioned by the project itself'. I was suggested |
21 |
> > > that if it's not official, we should close it instead. |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > If that is how it is perceived I'd be in favor of outright closing it at |
24 |
> > least |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> |
27 |
> I suppose the problem boils down to 'perceived by whom'. |
28 |
> |
29 |
|
30 |
Ya, the claim as official came up a while ago, I thought it was dealt |
31 |
with. I'm one of the devs with 'admin' rights it seems, I can change |
32 |
the description and server invite background (both have official in it). |
33 |
I'd change the description to something like the following. |
34 |
|
35 |
Discord server for Gentoo Linux, a free operating system based or Linux or FreeBSD. |
36 |
|
37 |
Though maybe we should use the language we used in the nitrokey |
38 |
announcment for how to descript Gentoo :D |
39 |
|
40 |
It does not look like I have the ability to remove the server entirely, |
41 |
as was suggested elsewhere. I don't think that's a good idea in any |
42 |
case. |
43 |
|
44 |
One thing that may help is to have multiple levels of control defined. |
45 |
|
46 |
Official - as K_F described before, website and email announce lists. |
47 |
Controled - controled / moderated by Gentoo pr / comrel |
48 |
This would be other email lists / aliases / facebook / etc |
49 |
unofficial - not activly moderated by Gentoo pr / comrel |
50 |
|
51 |
-- |
52 |
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) |