Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] CONFIG_PROTECT and ROOT!='/'
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:05:46
Message-Id: 20050315230543.GB7990@lion.gg3.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] CONFIG_PROTECT and ROOT!='/' by Brian Jackson
1 maillog: 15/03/2005-12:01:47(-0600): Brian Jackson types
2 > On 10:14:14 am 2005-03-15 Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net> wrote:
3 > > maillog: 15/03/2005-08:26:49(-0600): Brian Jackson types
4 > > > I have a bug filed for that too, but it's probably going to be a
5 > > > while before it's fixed. From what I've been told, it's not
6 > > > trivial to fix it because some of the config stuff isn't very
7 > > > well abstracted.
8 > >
9 > > It isn't? Are we talking about the same thing? After all, the
10 > > locations are just variables, that only need to be prefixed with
11 > > something. Could we get some input from whoever told you this?
12 >
13 > make.conf is easy. The profile isn't as easy. /etc/portage isn't easy
14 > at all. That's the basics. You'd have to ask the portage guys for more
15 > in depth info.
16
17 I was hoping to get a response from them here. Portage guys, you there?
18
19 --
20 / Georgi Georgiev / From 0 to "what seems to be the problem /
21 \ chutz@×××.net \ officer" in 8.3 seconds. -- Ad for the new \
22 / +81(90)6266-1163 / VW Corrado /
23 --
24 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] CONFIG_PROTECT and ROOT!='/' Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o>