1 |
On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 23:23 -0400, desultory wrote: |
2 |
> On 04/29/19 17:04, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
3 |
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 4:34 PM Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> |
4 |
> > wrote: |
5 |
> > > In this article on chat services used for OSS: |
6 |
> > > |
7 |
> > > https://catfox.life/2019/04/28/keeping-libre-software-accessible-to-all/ |
8 |
> > > |
9 |
> > > I was surprised to see a mention of Gentoo as a project that uses |
10 |
> > > "Discord as an official method of communication". When I |
11 |
> > > searched, I indeed found https://discordapp.com/invite/gentoo. |
12 |
> > > However, I'd never before heard we were using Discord (and didn't |
13 |
> > > find any mentions of Discord on the -dev or -project mailing |
14 |
> > > lists). |
15 |
> > > |
16 |
> > > Is this indeed an official venue? It's not listed on |
17 |
> > > https://gentoo.org/support/ (which does mention IRC). |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > Based on the #server-info channel, it looks like this server was |
20 |
> > created by Cynede. Perhaps they have more information. |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> Considering the reaction that I got when I asked him, I would advise |
24 |
> against bothering with contacting cynede about it. Specifically, when |
25 |
> I |
26 |
> asked on irc the response was serial evasive answers and when I |
27 |
> followed |
28 |
> up with e-mail the response mentioned the PR project wiki page |
29 |
> (without |
30 |
> actually linking to it) and expressly requested that I never discuss |
31 |
> it |
32 |
> with him again, that request was followed up with the same request |
33 |
> being |
34 |
> made in a public irc channel, just because I was looking for a |
35 |
> straight |
36 |
> answer and consistently not getting one. Also, I was accused of being |
37 |
> a |
38 |
> sockpuppet for having asked, despite using my gentoo cloak on |
39 |
> freenode |
40 |
> at the time. |
41 |
> |
42 |
> As I was eventually able to discover, PR (or at least some members |
43 |
> thereof) describes any site on which the PR project has an account |
44 |
> (in |
45 |
> the case of discord this type of account is known as a "server") to |
46 |
> be |
47 |
> an "official" communications channel. These "official" communications |
48 |
> channels are not announced when created and do not have projects, |
49 |
> even |
50 |
> PR sub-projects to tend to them, nor are they listed among the |
51 |
> support |
52 |
> venues are they are evidently not for user support, as they are |
53 |
> evidently intended simply for announcements and such they are merely |
54 |
> listed on the PR project wiki page [PR]. |
55 |
> |
56 |
> [PR] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Public_Relations |
57 |
> |
58 |
|
59 |
Hello. |
60 |
|
61 |
Right, alike reddit, twitter, facebook and other PR channels. It's |
62 |
"official" because it's controlled by PR Gentoo team, every Gentoo |
63 |
developer have admin rights, we should have 2+ developers as admins, at |
64 |
the moment there are 8 developers with admin rights but sure not all of |
65 |
them are active. It's not not official way of getting support or |
66 |
developers communication however it's official compared to other Gentoo |
67 |
servers on discord alike Gentoo facebook is official compared to other |
68 |
Gentoo facebook groups running by random people. It's writtin in PR |
69 |
project policy. |
70 |
|
71 |
I've used to explain it few times to several people including |
72 |
developers and some of people, even from Gentoo, just aggressively |
73 |
refuse to accept that. That's why we had conflict there. There are |
74 |
still people who are not fully agree with each other even inside PR |
75 |
team or possibly there is just some mess with terms. |
76 |
|
77 |
I'm sorry but your questions was really different, in case if you want |
78 |
to discuss PR project policy, how things become "official", who gave |
79 |
those people those rights, what words should be used and things alike |
80 |
that I'm really slightly tired from those questions and I'd like those |
81 |
to be escalated. |