Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net>
To: Gentoo Devt <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: app-admin/gkrellm & plugins
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 19:21:18
Message-Id: Y9V1qKZYzhagIJQs@ca.inter.net
1 [ This has been posted on Gentoo User,
2 but in case it hasn't been seen by discussants at Gentoo Dev, here it is.
3 It seems clear upstream isn't dead, simply quiet ]
4
5 On 1/28/23 05:35, Peter Humphrey wrote:
6 > I'm actually the one who first heard that the original maintainer had died. 
7 > I had written to him about some support issue, and got a belated reply
8 > from his brother.  Upstream is not dead at all,
9 > the activity level is just fairly low.
10 > I tried to post to -dev, but my message never got through,
11 > not sure if it's because I'm not a dev or made some other error in sending.
12 > The homepage is at htttps://gkrellm.srcbox.net
13 > with source at https://git.srcbox.net/gkrellm/gkrellm.
14
15 > The main problem is that is still uses gtk+2.
16 > They do have an open issue about that,
17 > but most of the discussion has been on why it would be so hard to upgrade.
18 > There is apparently a lot of fairly low-level graphics stuff going on
19 > and Bill himself (the original maintainer)
20 > said something like the conversion to gkt+3 would be difficult,
21 > but to go to gtk+4 would essentially be a re-write.
22 > Jack
23
24 --
25 ========================,,============================================
26 SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb
27 ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto
28 TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca