1 |
On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 16:51:38 +1000 |
2 |
Troy Dack <troy@××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Sat, 2004-04-03 at 16:44, Andrew Gaffney wrote: |
5 |
> > Someone posted an article[1] about optimizing distcc a few days ago |
6 |
> > on -user. It talked about using unsermake[2] instead of automake to |
7 |
> > generate Makefiles that let many source files be built at once, |
8 |
> > which allows you to take full advantage of a network full of distcc |
9 |
> > hosts. Did any of the devs take a look at it? It appears to only be |
10 |
> > available through KDE CVS, but that's never stopped any of you |
11 |
> > before :) |
12 |
|
13 |
Sounds neat, I'll have a look at it this week. |
14 |
|
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > [1] http://www.csh.rit.edu/slashdot/distcc.html |
17 |
> > [2] http://www.kde.me.uk/index.php?page=unsermake |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I did attempt to hack the kde-cvs eclass to use unsermake, it didn't |
20 |
> work too badly, the only problem was that every time you built a |
21 |
> kde-cvs based package the unsermake dir would be re-fetched. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> I suppose it wouldn't be too hard to create a standalone unsermake |
24 |
> ebuild, however unsermake was a little unreliable last time I tried |
25 |
> it. |
26 |
|
27 |
Define unreliable, please. |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
(o_ Markus Nigbur |
31 |
//\ Gentoo Linux Developer |
32 |
[ ]/_ http://www.gentoo.org |