1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
3 |
|
4 |
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:56:13 -0500
|
5 |
Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> wrote:
|
6 |
|
7 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
8 |
> Hash: SHA256 |
9 |
> |
10 |
> On 13/01/14 09:46 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote: |
11 |
> > On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:15:37 +0700 "C. Bergström" |
12 |
> > <cbergstrom@×××××××××.com> wrote: |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> >> Long term the API to pkgcore could be beneficial, but again I'm |
15 |
> >> not sure it's a game changer for users. |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > Long term, we should have an independent API backend that tools |
18 |
> > can query; not rewrite our tools every time users want to use them |
19 |
> > with a different package manager. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> ..you mean, define the API and include it in PMS? how much |
22 |
> bureaucracy will that need to occur? |
23 |
|
24 |
The API can be separate of the PMS. The bureaucracy needed for an API
|
25 |
to provide to tools, that doesn't need as much involvement as PMS.
|
26 |
|
27 |
- --
|
28 |
With kind regards,
|
29 |
|
30 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
|
31 |
Gentoo Developer
|
32 |
|
33 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o
|
34 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
|
35 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
|
36 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
37 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
|
38 |
|
39 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS1AbYAAoJEJWyH81tNOV90DEIAIk+zQe4vgJ2XWchQLET064Q
|
40 |
mij/sQQRcI52PZwXFfRh23G+dKkywsPIg+US5KmbWJTtT4UbbLFnn4KCRB/QZE6E
|
41 |
43wHYsKGMgTovpkXQZEy8O4GbFUOb1k9DrsR05r91+QUUUmxxxi9ODq86kavtPVs
|
42 |
UaPyz3me4j3olHLSxzUtxJd5/AgHGwkH+YHtcWny2oaXNUIFpusIPRURqyFyE4xI
|
43 |
Leq/w8/nsmeCc25pPN4cbY6bBwOwCxsZZwik3gmz6FzrAVwCjuRvX8n7szl8viNr
|
44 |
Kd56odFjX/n7pAL+Rj52spz6TNcSe1H8IMkwI9rMYc/LYQSw+/uCGnAXeIxrzWY=
|
45 |
=F2d3
|
46 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |