1 |
As per my comment in bugzilla [1] I said that the patch should be submitted |
2 |
upstream prior having it in cvs. |
3 |
|
4 |
Yet you decided to completely ignore my statement and just smash in the |
5 |
patch anyway [2]. |
6 |
|
7 |
Please don't do this ever again. We had shitload of distro patches before |
8 |
and it is hell to strip away later on. |
9 |
|
10 |
For your statement of lacking documentation, when I google gerrit |
11 |
libreoffice first two links lead directly to the instance and 3rd to wiki |
12 |
[3], which no suprise is guide how to set it up and submit request, so stop |
13 |
lying. |
14 |
|
15 |
As you like to ignore maintainer requests I now expect you to submit it to |
16 |
the gerit, since now you have the guide and you can proceed without an |
17 |
issue right? |
18 |
|
19 |
Note that I have nothing against other devs submitting fixes to ebuilds |
20 |
maintained by me, but directly ignoring what I said on a bug and doing |
21 |
whatever you see fit does not match that at all. |
22 |
|
23 |
Tomas |
24 |
|
25 |
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479604#16 |
26 |
[2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479604#19 |
27 |
[3] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/gerrit |