Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: emboss.eclass as replacement for embassy.eclass
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 03:17:46
Message-Id: 4D802BAE.8000803@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: emboss.eclass as replacement for embassy.eclass by Jeroen Roovers
1 On 03/15/2011 10:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
2 > On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:06:36 -0400
3 > Mike Frysinger<vapier@g.o> wrote:
4 >
5 >>> # The full name and version of the EMBASSY package
6 >>> (excluding the Gentoo # revision number)
7 >>> EF=$(echo ${EN} | tr "[:lower:]" "[:upper:]")-${PV}
8 >>
9 >> ugh, but i guess we cant do much until we have newer bash
10 >
11 > bash 4.1 has been stable for half a year now. Not long enough?
12 >
13 > EF="${EN^^}"
14
15 Not until PMS specifies[1] something other than: "The interpreter is
16 assumed to be GNU bash, version 3.2 or later"
17
18 [1]: http://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/head/pms.html#x1-650007
19
20 -Jeremy