1 |
Dnia 2014-03-01, o godz. 07:28:35 |
2 |
Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> napisał(a): |
3 |
|
4 |
> |
5 |
> On 01/03/14 04:55, Joshua Kinard wrote: |
6 |
> > 3. Some profiles also override INSTALL_MASK, such as Gentoo/FreeBSD, because |
7 |
> > systemd does not apply there. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Wow. I don't think we should allow this without first having exactly |
10 |
> what was suggested in this thread, a way of redefining the order |
11 |
> away from INSTALL_MASK_ORDER="profile:ebuild:user", because |
12 |
> if we allow INSTALL_MASK usage in profiles without having a setting |
13 |
> for the order, it'll always be INSTALL_MASK_ORDER="profile:user", |
14 |
> and it's very hard for user to get his setting respected even if he |
15 |
> wanted to. |
16 |
|
17 |
INSTALL_MASK is not stacked. That is, if user sets INSTALL_MASK, |
18 |
profile setting gets erased. |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
Best regards, |
22 |
Michał Górny |