| 1 |
Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 13:25 -0800, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 3 |
>>> License groups may be negated with the result that all elements of that group |
| 4 |
>>> are also negated. |
| 5 |
>> Left out that if it's unset, it should default to ACCEPT_LICENSE=* , |
| 6 |
>> meaning no license filtering. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Except that it shouldn't. It should be set to @NON-INTERACTIVE, as the |
| 9 |
> GLEP says, to match what we currently have with the combination of |
| 10 |
> portage+eutils.eclass settings. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Certain packages will *always* require interactive acceptance of the |
| 13 |
> license, as they currently do. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I agree with Brian on this. No setup should mean no rules. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
If people decide not to use the function it is not Gentoo's decision to |
| 19 |
still filter their packages. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
George |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives