Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] debianutils: system worthy ? |
| Date: | Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:24:02 |
| Message-Id: | 200801280723.19003.vapier@gentoo.org |
| 1 | now that the mktemp binary has been moved out of debianutils and integrated |
| 2 | straight into coreutils, perhaps it's time to ask how important this package |
| 3 | is to everyone. current debianutils is part of "system" and provides: |
| 4 | - installkernel |
| 5 | - run-parts |
| 6 | - tempfile |
| 7 | - savelog |
| 8 | - mkboot |
| 9 | do people consider these things critical ? i dont know the last time i |
| 10 | personally needed/wanted any of these ... |
| 11 | -mike |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] debianutils: system worthy ? | "Rémi Cardona" <remi@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] debianutils: system worthy ? | Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: debianutils: system worthy ? | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] debianutils: system worthy ? | Doug Klima <cardoe@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] debianutils: system worthy ? | Yuri Vasilevski <yvasilev@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] debianutils: system worthy ? | "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] debianutils: system worthy ? | Philip Webb <purslow@×××××××××.ca> |