Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Andrej Kacian <ticho@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI spec (was Re: Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs))
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:51:50
Message-Id: 20070222124617.3fb7ab36@Kacian2.emea.hpqcorp.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI spec (was Re: Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) by Daniel Robbins
1 On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:48:49 -0700
2 "Daniel Robbins" <drobbins.daniel@×××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > On 2/21/07, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> wrote:
5 > > Are you insane? What on earth could Jakub possibly contribute? If
6 > > you want a rough indication of Jakub's level of ebuild
7 > > understanding, take a look at bug 160328.
8 >
9 > Is there any process in place to ban people from the gentoo-dev
10 > mailing list who are chronically verbally abusive and make no effort
11 > at all to be polite?
12 >
13 > We shouldn't have to put up with this.
14
15 Oh come on. Put up with what? He's just defending himself, and for the
16 record, I agree completely with his standpoint in this whole discussion.
17
18 It has already been established that EAPI spec is being worked on by
19 enough qualified people - how about everyone drops the subject and lets
20 them work in peace?
21
22 As for Ciaran bashing Jakub, I can't help but nod (and gasp at
23 some of Jakub's comments) - for quite some time now.
24
25 Regards,
26 --
27 Andrej
28
29 --
30 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI spec (was Re: Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) Ioannis Aslanidis <aslanidis@×××××.com>