| 1 |
On Wednesday 02 July 2003 22:29, Todd Berman wrote: |
| 2 |
> Actually, I have to disagree. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> At home I have a desktop with a 80211b card, so I would like optional |
| 5 |
> 80211b support, but I don't have any bluetooth devices, so I would |
| 6 |
> prefer if this was a different flag. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Just because something is wireless doesn't mean I want it even though I |
| 9 |
> have a 80211b card. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Hm. But if we have separate flags for every kind of wireless h/w, they won't |
| 12 |
stand much of a chance to be made global. What's a term somewhere in the |
| 13 |
middle? 802.11x? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Dan Armak |
| 17 |
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE) |
| 18 |
Matan, Israel |
| 19 |
Public GPG key: http://cvs.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key |
| 20 |
Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951 |
Archives