| 1 |
i merely said it doesn't compile, if it doesn't compile, it doesn't |
| 2 |
generate code, thus the not generated code isn't bad. |
| 3 |
it COULD of course generate bad code, but im not talking about random |
| 4 |
runtime errors, but am talking about compile/syntax errors |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
>On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 23:35:10 -0500 Daniel Goller <morfic@g.o> |
| 11 |
>wrote: |
| 12 |
>| considering that kde 3.2 compiled flawless with gcc 3.4.1 shows it is |
| 13 |
>| the code of kde that broke, not the compiler, it merely is more strict |
| 14 |
>| and thus complains about stuff the c++ standard doesnt allow |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
>Uh, how? GCC might be generating bad code. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives