1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Alec Warner wrote: |
5 |
> Official policy states that CVS ebuilds should never be marked |
6 |
> stable[1]. Yet many ebuilds that are based on cvs sources and are |
7 |
> marked stable on arch's. I would like to know why this is so. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> ./net-misc/netcomics-cvs/netcomics-cvs-0.14.1.ebuild:KEYWORDS="x86 ~amd64" |
10 |
> ./games-fps/blackshades-cvs/blackshades-cvs-20031110.ebuild:KEYWORDS="x86 |
11 |
> ~ppc ~amd64" |
12 |
> ./dev-embedded/sdcc-cvs/sdcc-cvs-2.4.0-r1.ebuild:KEYWORDS="x86 ~ppc amd64" |
13 |
> ./games-fps/avp-cvs/avp-cvs-20031110.ebuild:KEYWORDS="x86" |
14 |
> |
15 |
> This was just a hacked up search I did on the tree while in class, and |
16 |
> is no way inclusive of all packages breaking policy. If you want bugs |
17 |
> for them, I 'll make them. |
18 |
|
19 |
[1] |
20 |
http://devrel.gentoo.org/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2&chap=3#doc_chap1_sect9 |
21 |
|
22 |
;-) |
23 |
- -- |
24 |
Alin DOBRE |
25 |
Romanian Lead Translator |
26 |
Gentoo Documentation Project: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ |
27 |
Gentoo.RO Community: http://www.gentoo.ro/ |
28 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
29 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
30 |
|
31 |
iD8DBQFDLvesmG51ym6Hu9gRAhPdAKCrID8Dit2/XsitxYl9gWDZy2AqeQCeP0nd |
32 |
FRSrdBcQHAd2p32oMsqeCV0= |
33 |
=569V |
34 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
35 |
-- |
36 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |