Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] games.eclass: move /etc/env.d/90games to a separate package | ||
| Date: | Sun, 02 Feb 2014 12:48:26 | ||
| Message-Id: | 21230.16016.570158.723410@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] [RFC] games.eclass: move /etc/env.d/90games to a separate package by hasufell |
||
| 1 | >>>>> On Sun, 02 Feb 2014, hasufell wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417383 |
| 4 | |
| 5 | [gentoo-envd-0.ebuild] |
| 6 | |
| 7 | > EAPI=3 |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Why not newest EAPI? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | > SRC_URI="" |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Not needed. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | > RDEPEND="" |
| 16 | > DEPEND="" |
| 17 | |
| 18 | Ditto. |
| 19 | |
| 20 | [games.eclass.patch] |
| 21 | |
| 22 | > +if [[ ${PN} != "gentoo-envd" ]] ; then |
| 23 | |
| 24 | Better include ${CATEGORY} in this test, especially with such a |
| 25 | generic package name. (Or call the package gentoo-games-envd?) |
| 26 | |
| 27 | Ulrich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] games.eclass: move /etc/env.d/90games to a separate package | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] games.eclass: move /etc/env.d/90games to a separate package | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] games.eclass: move /etc/env.d/90games to a separate package | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |