Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Mix-in Support Tracker
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 21:42:13
Message-Id: pan$f3cc3$4c3a2bc1$896b2f13$a0364829@cox.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Mix-in Support Tracker by Rich Freeman
1 Rich Freeman posted on Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:58:46 -0400 as excerpted:
2
3 > [Mix-in support] For the most part we just need to do the work, and the
4 > first step is identifying blockers. If some end up involving PMS/etc
5 > then we may need to get the Council involved.
6 >
7 > Rather than hijacking every @system change discussion with this, I
8 > created a tracker at:
9 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=523036
10
11 Thanks. This does seem a useful way to take gentoo to the next level.
12 =:^)
13
14 While I'm no PMS authority, given that we're talking profiles here,
15 definitely the other PMs will have to be involved, and I'd guess PMS as
16 well. When the time comes the mix-ins profiles will need added to the
17 tree and eventually, to become the default. Major bits of that will
18 require council approval.
19
20 So a tracking bug is definitely a good first step and demonstrates taking
21 ownership, but I'd also suggest a GLEP. Certainly it's a big enough
22 change to deserve one, and getting a reasonably formal proposal out there
23 and hashed out will provide a guideline for the various steps as they
24 proceed.
25
26 Thanks again. The closest comparable would have to be the switch to
27 cascading profiles, with this arguably step two of that project, finally
28 allowing the locked up potential to blossom. =:^)
29
30 --
31 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
32 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
33 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman