| 1 |
Doug Goldstein wrote: |
| 2 |
> Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Branko Badrljica wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>>> Since I might not be the only tinkerer on Gentoo to try stuff like that |
| 6 |
>>> and since it took me a day to find this, maybe it wouldn't hurt to check |
| 7 |
>>> for this kind of thing in portage ? |
| 8 |
>>> At the very least failed cp should stop emerge... |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> Well there isn't a single place to add die statements. The important |
| 14 |
>> thing is for ebuild developers to remember to add || die to all stuff |
| 15 |
>> that could potentially fail. If you find the cp in question that failed |
| 16 |
>> for you, the right place to file bugs is https://bugs.gentoo.org. |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> Regards, |
| 19 |
>> Petteri |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
> Looks like people have been truly over-zealous when removing "die" |
| 23 |
> statements from ebuilds lately. I've added back to HAL an assortment of |
| 24 |
> "die" statements. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> I hope this hasn't happened in too many other ebuilds. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Who has been removing die statements? Is this a suggested way of action |
| 30 |
somewhere by someone? |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Regards, |
| 33 |
Petteri |
Archives