| 1 |
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 15:14 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ivan Yosifov wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 14:52 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> >>are running vesafb-tng and have >=1GB RAM then try |
| 6 |
> >>turning off vesafb-tng |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Why ? |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Actually, this shouldn't matter, as this only occurs with 64gb highmem. I only |
| 13 |
> mentioned it as this is the only "random crasher" Gentoo kernel bug that we've |
| 14 |
> had recently: |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101359 |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Actually, there are also some upstream x86_64 issues. Frank, are you on amd64? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Daniel |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I'm still on the kernel from the life-cd. The self compiled kernel has |
| 23 |
the highmem option set to off (I have only 1GB). I'm on x86 Intel |
| 24 |
Celeron M and have CHOST set to i686-pc-linux-gnu and CFLAGS="-O2 |
| 25 |
-march=pentium2" |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I've unset nearly everything in USE to get a running minimal system (91 |
| 28 |
packages). Let's see first if X builds without any acceleration, DRI, |
| 29 |
GLX and so on. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
I'll let you know all and every of my results. Be patient, my time is |
| 32 |
limited so I can't deliver a result every day. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Regards |
| 35 |
Frank |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives