| 1 |
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Richard Yao <ryao@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> as the long as the few interested in it do not interfere with existing |
| 3 |
> things, they are free to package it as they see fit. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Can we kindly refrain from starting another systemd flamewar in a |
| 6 |
thread whose initial topic was thanking us for not letting the systemd |
| 7 |
flamewars get out of hand? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
As far as I can see the current compromises seem to be working fairly |
| 10 |
well. There is really no need to start drawing more lines in the |
| 11 |
sand. If at some point supporters of any particular design start |
| 12 |
feeling limited by our current policies we can always revisit them. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Rich |
Archives