1 |
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:19:20AM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 |
> On 23:12 Tue 24 Feb , Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
3 |
> > Here's the preliminary agenda. I'm running a bit behind on -dev, so |
4 |
> > it's a little out of date re GLEPs 54/55. People including lu_zero, |
5 |
> > cardoe, dev-zero, and tanderson should fill us in on things below that |
6 |
> > they've taken responsibility for. Anyone else can chime in anywhere! |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I'm not prepared to decide on the whole set of solutions related to GLEP |
9 |
> 55 yet. I need more time to think about them, and since new options are |
10 |
> showing up frequently, it makes that pretty hard. Here's what action I'd |
11 |
> like to see regarding the whole thing: |
12 |
|
13 |
A delay would actually be useful. Folks (outside of the ml) have made |
14 |
some claims that can be disproven/proven via prototyping a pm. |
15 |
|
16 |
I won't get it today, but week or so should be enough to nail down the |
17 |
performance cases, backwards compatibility, etc. |
18 |
|
19 |
~harring |