Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From:	"Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov" <gentoo@×××.name>
To:	gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject:	Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New eclass vim-runtime
Date:	Fri, 08 Sep 2017 23:44:27
Message-Id:	`13934394.zehC0WrXp7@note`
In Reply to:	[gentoo-dev] [RFC] New eclass vim-runtime by Aric Belsito

1	DEPENDS part and "binary" function makes me sad panda:
2	they assumes there are no "vims" exist, while there is at least `vim-qt`
3	(well, actually that one is dropped from gentoo) and `neovim-qt` (and that one
4	is in overlays, but anyway), and so on.
5
6	I think, it'd be nice to somehow avoid exact binary names matching (just as
7	exact package names), or, uhm... make it extendable somehow?