| 1 |
Sven <svoop@××××××××.ch> posted loom.20090514T182756-964@××××××××××.org, |
| 2 |
excerpted below, on Thu, 14 May 2009 18:34:29 +0000: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Duncan <1i5t5.duncan <at> cox.net> writes: |
| 5 |
>> FWIW, that'd not be a portage issue per se, but an EAPI issue, since it |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I see, very interesting! Sounds like a lengthy process, but never mind. |
| 8 |
> Do you know where EAPI changes are discussed? (Google and the Bugtracker |
| 9 |
> didn't yield a useful reply.) |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Here? (See the current GLEP55 thread, among others.) Also the council |
| 12 |
list and meetings, since they must approve EAPIs before they are allowed |
| 13 |
in the tree. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Also see the various PMS (package management spec) threads, and the |
| 16 |
app-doc/pms package, for the current EAPI documentation. From the |
| 17 |
package metadata, the homepage is: |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/pms.xml |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 23 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 24 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives