1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>: |
4 |
|
5 |
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 22:14:25 +0200 |
6 |
> Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o> wrote: |
7 |
> > > Another one of the things I'd like to see and help reform with the |
8 |
> > > council. First off it spends way too much time on EAPI/PMS. There |
9 |
> > > is no reason to make the council an extension of the portage team. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > As member of the PMS team I agree, we have to reach out to more |
12 |
> > people. No matter how well Ciaran does the job as editor-in-chief |
13 |
> > the process needs to be broadened to involve other groups, too. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Which groups who would like to be able to contribute currently feel |
16 |
> that they can't, why do they feel that and why haven't they said so? |
17 |
|
18 |
For example people from the other package managers apart from |
19 |
Paludis. What we need is a more straight forward way for new |
20 |
features...yes, some measures are already being worked out, but there is |
21 |
still work to do. |
22 |
|
23 |
> Really, the only big issues we've had with EAPI work are getting |
24 |
> Portage support and working around a Council that wants to both |
25 |
> micro-manage every last detail of every last feature and only put in |
26 |
> an hour of work every two weeks. |
27 |
|
28 |
Discussion of EAPI features took place on the -dev mailing list |
29 |
involving council members, so one hour every two weeks is quite |
30 |
exaggerated. |
31 |
|
32 |
V-Li |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project |
36 |
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode |
37 |
|
38 |
<URL:http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/> |