Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thomas Beierlein <tomjbe@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sci-electronics/gtkwave: ChangeLog gtkwave-3.3.28.ebuild
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 06:09:47
Message-Id: 20120109070842.29c27097@ham
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sci-electronics/gtkwave: ChangeLog gtkwave-3.3.28.ebuild by Ryan Hill
1 On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 13:55:17 -0600
2 Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 16:22:24 +0000 (UTC)
5 > "Thomas Beierlein (tomjbe)" <tomjbe@g.o> wrote:
6 >
7 > > tomjbe 12/01/08 16:22:24
8 > >
9 > > Modified: ChangeLog
10 > > Added: gtkwave-3.3.28.ebuild
11 > > Log:
12 > > Strip flags (bug #377935). Version bump. Drop old unstable
13 > > versions
14 >
15 > Please avoid doing this unless your package fails with basic
16 > (supported) flags, or flags that are common enough that a lot of
17 > people are hitting it. -floop-parallelize-all is neither of these and
18 > in this case is causing an ICE (internal compiler error) that needs
19 > to be fixed, not wallpapered over.
20 >
21 Sorry, my fault! You are right. I was looking for sci-electronics bugs
22 to fix and did not recognize that it was assigned to toolchain.
23
24 Thanks for catching it.
25
26 Thomas.
27
28
29
30
31 --