| 1 |
On Sun, 6 May 2007 15:37:05 -0400 |
| 2 |
Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > And, if that happens (which it won't), we'll have more experience |
| 4 |
> > and we can evaluate future news items based upon that. A more |
| 5 |
> > realistic view for your typical user is less than a news item per |
| 6 |
> > week. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> And what are you basing this on? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Knowledge of the tree, and several years experience using it and |
| 11 |
observing how often things change that would require news items. This |
| 12 |
was part of the original GLEP 42 design. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> > > > Paludis users do not consider that news item trivial. |
| 15 |
> > > |
| 16 |
> > > If I was a paludis user I would considder this trivial. The same |
| 17 |
> > > information is availible a) from the package itself. b) from the |
| 18 |
> > > changelog, and c) it still works without the change! |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > But you aren't, and those who are disagree. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> I've yet to here from the "those who are" otherwise yet. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Then you haven't actually bothered to read the threads, nor listen for |
| 25 |
feedback anywhere else where Paludis users talk to Paludis developers. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives