| 1 |
On 12 May 2014 03:28, Jauhien Piatlicki <jauhien@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi all, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> LXQt 0.7.0 has been released [1]. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> As it is project different from LXDE |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
That is debatable. LXQt is released by the merged LXDE and Razor-Qt |
| 9 |
upstreams. One could say there are simply two expressions of LXDE now: |
| 10 |
one in GTK+ and one in Qt. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> and will be supported in parallel |
| 13 |
> with it, it seems like a good idea add a new category lxqt-base. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Personally I don't see a need for this. All the Qt-specific packages |
| 16 |
are named accordingly, and should not confuse anyone installing |
| 17 |
anything from the lxde-base category. I would like to see that latter |
| 18 |
category re-used for this. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
But I know the maintainers of LXDE herd do not support this view, and |
| 21 |
since at this point I don't have the time to maintain LXQt, I will |
| 22 |
leave the decision up to you guys. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> compton-conf |
| 25 |
> libqtxdg |
| 26 |
> qt-gtk-engine |
| 27 |
> libfm |
| 28 |
> libsysstat |
| 29 |
> obconf-qt |
| 30 |
> pcmanfm-qt |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
I think these packages could be placed in the relevant x11-* |
| 33 |
categories, as they are perfectly usable in other environments as |
| 34 |
well, tho for ease of maintenance you could stick them with the LXQt |
| 35 |
packages. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
Cheers, |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Ben | yngwin |
| 41 |
Gentoo developer |
Archives