Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Seemant Kulleen <seemant@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [last rites] virtual/x11
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:01:49
Message-Id: 1174924695.5966.10.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [last rites] virtual/x11 by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 15:38 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:07:03 -0400
3 > Seemant Kulleen <seemant@g.o> wrote:
4 > > Ciaran has brought attention to a very important thing -- QA seems to
5 > > take a backseat to a few things, and it is actually a little
6 > > disturbing that it does.
7 >
8 > I believe the QA team expect developers to *ask* when they want QA to
9 > intervene on a thing like this. There aren't enough people in QA to
10 > find every problem in the tree on their own...
11 >
12
13 You're absolutely correct: I just wanted to clear up something I didn't
14 state too clearly in my original email. In the bit you quoted, I was
15 referring to QA as a process and mindset issue, rather than the QA team.
16 So I certainly wasn't trying to put blame or onus on the QA team, but
17 rather mentioning the fact (as you have, too :) that QA as an idea and
18 culture seems to take a backseat.
19
20 Thanks,
21
22 Seemant

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature