| 1 |
On 09:53 Thu 03 Apr , Thomas Anderson wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 11:35 Thu 03 Apr , Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Petteri R??ty wrote: |
| 4 |
> >>> Recalling previous discussions about work on gentoo and some of the |
| 5 |
> >>> existing roles, what will you do to AT folks, release members or QA |
| 6 |
> >>> members? Are they also obliged to do a weekly commit to keep their |
| 7 |
> >>> "privileges"? |
| 8 |
> >> AT folks aren't devs and see above. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > To be clear, I didn't meant arch testers but people that do keywords for |
| 11 |
> > arch teams. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Actually, 'AT' can refer to either arch teams or Arch Testers, but given |
| 14 |
> the fact that he was referring to those people with commit access, it |
| 15 |
> should be obvious he meant 'Arch Teams'. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
It wasn't obvious at all to me, because he was talking about people who |
| 18 |
would have trouble keeping commit access. My understanding is that arch |
| 19 |
team members are constantly testing and keywording. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Thanks, |
| 22 |
Donnie |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives