1 |
Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
2 |
> On Monday 23 August 2004 17:36, Lina Pezzella wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>>I would entirely agree on the second point there. System for macos has |
5 |
>>very few things installed (gzip not among them) because a lot is |
6 |
>>provided by MacOS. At this point in the game, where we are porting |
7 |
>>Gentoo to non-Linux userlands, it is probably a bad idea to "assume" |
8 |
>>much of anything. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> |
11 |
> I think gzip, tar, unzip and bzip2 should be runtime dependencies of portage |
12 |
> itself. Portage needs them to unpack almost all packages. It would be hell if |
13 |
> we would need to add any of them as a dependency just because of the fact |
14 |
> that the package is offered in a tarball of some sort (most packages are). |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Paul |
17 |
> |
18 |
|
19 |
Was there a final verdict on this? |
20 |
|
21 |
The two possible solutions mentioned in this thread: |
22 |
|
23 |
1) add gzip (and others) as a portage run-time dep |
24 |
2) change all DEPEND's containing app-arch/gzip to virtual/gzip |
25 |
|
26 |
Regards |
27 |
-- |
28 |
Tact, n.: The unsaid part of what you're thinking. |
29 |
|
30 |
/* Aaron Walker |
31 |
* http://butsugenjitemple.org/~ka0ttic/ |
32 |
*/ |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |