Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: foser <foser@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-db/freetds
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 21:05:27
Message-Id: 1085691956.9861.5.camel@rivendell
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-db/freetds by Stuart Herbert
1 On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 19:43 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
2 > On Thursday 27 May 2004 19:35, foser wrote:
3 > > Then the logical step is to remove it. It is after all not maintained by
4 > > anyone. Or are you (and a herd behind you) going to take care of it ?
5
6 > Well, as both Gnome and PHP find it useful, perhaps it'd make sense for both
7 > of us to take it under our wing?
8
9 Nah.. we comment it out just like that. It would be something if we had
10 to maintain libs just because there's a gnome frontend for it. Well.. ok
11 we already do that, but we don't need more of those.
12
13 I'd say the guy who does the most bumping makes the maintainer..
14 robbat2
15
16 It is questionable in itself that this package clearly had a lot of
17 maintenance after the introduction of metadata and it still has no
18 metadata.xml & set maintainership trough a herd.
19
20 - foser

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-db/freetds Stuart Herbert <stuart@g.o>