1 |
On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 19:43 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote: |
2 |
> On Thursday 27 May 2004 19:35, foser wrote: |
3 |
> > Then the logical step is to remove it. It is after all not maintained by |
4 |
> > anyone. Or are you (and a herd behind you) going to take care of it ? |
5 |
|
6 |
> Well, as both Gnome and PHP find it useful, perhaps it'd make sense for both |
7 |
> of us to take it under our wing? |
8 |
|
9 |
Nah.. we comment it out just like that. It would be something if we had |
10 |
to maintain libs just because there's a gnome frontend for it. Well.. ok |
11 |
we already do that, but we don't need more of those. |
12 |
|
13 |
I'd say the guy who does the most bumping makes the maintainer.. |
14 |
robbat2 |
15 |
|
16 |
It is questionable in itself that this package clearly had a lot of |
17 |
maintenance after the introduction of metadata and it still has no |
18 |
metadata.xml & set maintainership trough a herd. |
19 |
|
20 |
- foser |