| 1 |
On Wednesday 15 June 2005 18:29, Andrej Kacian wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:21:20 +0200 |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Why not create a "voicebot" that would sit in the irc channel (the |
| 6 |
> > subject would refer to it), that developers could send a message to, and |
| 7 |
> > that would automatically be forwarded to a team of developers. If the bot |
| 8 |
> > would forward the communication to all members and the requestor double |
| 9 |
> > action is avoided, and users know where to go to get voice. The voicebot |
| 10 |
> > automatically maintains the list of active voice team members. It could |
| 11 |
> > even be made to block users that should not be allowed to bother the team |
| 12 |
> > (for example because they seriously misbehave themselves). |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
+1 |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> Why needlessly create more artificial "bureaucracy" than is necessary? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
1. Users have confidence that the request is going to the right people. |
| 19 |
2. Developers who don't want the requests won't get them. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Is that not a win/win situation? Where exactly is the "bureaucracy"? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Regards, |
| 24 |
Jason Stubbs |
Archives