| 1 |
begin quote |
| 2 |
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 11:29:29 -0400 |
| 3 |
Donny Davies <woodchip@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> Hi Spider |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 12:43:56PM +0200, Spider wrote: |
| 8 |
> >Does this mean we can start implementing "ln -s star tar" in our |
| 9 |
> >systems? (star is another tar implementation thats more posix |
| 10 |
> >compliant than GNU tar is. ) |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> It may produce archives more in-line with POSIX standards but |
| 13 |
> the command-line options are different. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Yes, but if portage starts to become more POSIX compliant and compliant |
| 16 |
with the BSD implementation it will make such a transition easier. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
//Spider |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
begin .signature |
| 23 |
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! |
| 24 |
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
| 25 |
end |
Archives