| 1 |
Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 19:41:20 Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> I have a question or two. I don't care if you, or others, reply to this |
| 5 |
>> with a answer, just think on it. A policy, rule if you will, has been |
| 6 |
>> decided on by the council. This after MUCH discussion on this list and |
| 7 |
>> the council hearing both sides of the argument. You, apparently on your |
| 8 |
>> own or with a few others, have decided to ignore the policy or rule. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
> umm, no, ive done no such thing. try again. |
| 11 |
> -mike |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Let me see if I understand this correctly. Most devs and some users |
| 15 |
wants things put in the changelog. I don't know if it was you before |
| 16 |
but in the past someone didn't want to put when versions are removed. |
| 17 |
That person, whoever it was, said they were not going to do it because |
| 18 |
it was silly or whatever. This was taken to the council and it was |
| 19 |
decided that all changes had to be put in the changelog. Now in this |
| 20 |
thread, about the same thing from my understanding. You said "waste of |
| 21 |
time" and the policy is not "sane". |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
So, council says it has to be done. You say you won't. Tell me where I |
| 24 |
missed the point here. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Thanks for the reply but I think this is going to be headed back up the |
| 27 |
food chain again. It appears that either rules mean nothing or they |
| 28 |
have to be enforced on everyone. The rule makers need to decide this. |
| 29 |
I suspect the reason this thread has gotten quiet is because it has |
| 30 |
already been discussed off this list about what is coming next. Just me |
| 31 |
reading tea leaves here. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
My advice, follow the rules or get the rules changed. Don't break them |
| 34 |
tho. It doesn't matter to me if you take that advice or not. Just saying. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Dale |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
:-) :-) |
Archives