| 1 |
On 12/2/15 2:06 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> So you're saying we should write a whole eclass to do: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> append-cppflags -std=c++11 |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> ? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
I think you mean append-cxxflags. Anyhow, I had an off list discussion |
| 10 |
with David Klaftenegger about the semantic difference between c++11 and |
| 11 |
98 with respect to their atomics and I'm convinced that a global |
| 12 |
-std=c++11 could get us into trouble on packages that make use of |
| 13 |
threading. So drop my idea of global c++11 and you'll have to catch |
| 14 |
these on a per package basis. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
| 18 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
| 19 |
E-Mail : blueness@g.o |
| 20 |
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA |
| 21 |
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA |
Archives