1 |
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 15:29 +0100, Christian Faulhammer wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> XEmacs: |
4 |
> I cannot tell much, but graaff seems to have closed most of the severe |
5 |
> bugs and worked on having more/bette eclasses for the app-xemacs |
6 |
> category. |
7 |
|
8 |
Most bugs are closed and the ones remaining have mostly been discussed |
9 |
with upstream, although that doesn't mean a solution is forthcoming in |
10 |
all cases. We are also fully in sync with upstream's stable elisp |
11 |
packages. |
12 |
|
13 |
Next steps: |
14 |
- replace the xemacs-packages-sumo package with a meta package so that |
15 |
we can avoid file collisions all over the place |
16 |
- check packages with an emacs use flag to see if xemacs can also be |
17 |
supported |
18 |
- include xemacs 21.5 in the tree after the next upstream release; with |
19 |
this release the package files will also move from /usr/lib |
20 |
to /usr/share |
21 |
|
22 |
Hans |