1 |
El sáb, 06-08-2016 a las 17:09 +0300, Andrew Savchenko escribió: |
2 |
> On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 13:37:19 +0000 Peter Stuge wrote: |
3 |
> > |
4 |
> > Hi Pacho, many thanks for your work, but.. |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > Pacho Ramos wrote: |
7 |
> > Pacho Ramos wrote: |
8 |
> > Pacho Ramos wrote: |
9 |
> > Pacho Ramos wrote: |
10 |
> > Pacho Ramos wrote: |
11 |
> > Pacho Ramos wrote: |
12 |
> > Pacho Ramos wrote: |
13 |
> > Pacho Ramos wrote: |
14 |
> > Pacho Ramos wrote: |
15 |
> > Pacho Ramos wrote: |
16 |
> > Pacho Ramos wrote: |
17 |
> > Pacho Ramos wrote: |
18 |
> > Pacho Ramos wrote: |
19 |
> > Pacho Ramos wrote: |
20 |
> > > |
21 |
> > > Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 15:22:22 +0200 |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > ..do you think you can arrange to post everything in one mail, |
24 |
> > instead of 14 different ones in a single day? |
25 |
> |
26 |
> I suppose these posts are automated (at least partially), since each |
27 |
> of them is linked to a different retirement bug. So you shouldn't |
28 |
> blame Pacho for his work. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Best regards, |
31 |
> Andrew Savchenko |
32 |
|
33 |
No, sadly all the work is manual... and that is the reason I do every |
34 |
step per person, because as it takes lots of time, I want to finish one |
35 |
person completely before either jumping to the next or going to do |
36 |
other things. |
37 |
|
38 |
The reason is that I cannot predict if I will be able to handle all the |
39 |
remaining cases or, maybe, I will need to do 3 today, 5 tomorrow... |
40 |
maybe 10 in two months when I have time again. This way at least I let |
41 |
people to start getting the packages as soon as I finish a person and |
42 |
other can start to work as soon as possible on the bug reports without |
43 |
needing to wait for me finishing all. |
44 |
|
45 |
Then, it's a bit a consequence of the workflow (paradoxically, I have a |
46 |
different workflow when treecleaning that ends up usually with me |
47 |
sending a big mail with the packages I am able to hardmask on a day... |
48 |
and some people complained because they wanted one mail per package |
49 |
^_^) |